Sermon based on Mark 14:1-11 (Covenant Mennonite Church, Winkler, MB)
Peoria Mennonite Fellowship in Peoria Illinois was a small but quickly growing and vibrant Mennonite church. They met Sunday evenings renting use of the sanctuary of the local Episcopal (or Anglican) church. The building was in an older and increasingly lower-economic area of the city. While this Mennonite Fellowship was growing and full of life, the Episcopal church was shrinking and aging, and finally the diocese decided to close the church. These two congregations had a strong relationship sharing worship a few Sundays each year, and the Episcopal Diocese offered to sell the old church structure to the Mennonite Fellowship for $1. The Fellowship knew the place needed some updates, and maintenance would be ongoing but were thrilled at all the new possibilities a large facility could provide them, so they purchased the church. They had several visioning meetings about how they could make use of the space. There were dreams for an after-school drop in center for the local children, creating a free-store with donated items and food, providing office space for some non-profits working in their community. They had all sorts of ideas of how this space could be a center for justice and community making.
One day a long-time member and retired music professor met with the pastor over coffee and told him how excited he was about the new place and all the opportunities, and then said he would like to donate $350,000 for the purchase and installation of a beautiful new pipe organ. He could also arrange for organists to play.
All these dreams of serving the community and now $350,00 – for a pipe organ. What should the church do?
We will return to them, but now let’s turn to our text. Our text tells us two stories. At the beginning and end it is the story of people in the shadows, scheming for ways to end Jesus’ life, and in the middle a story we hear of anointing, and people’s response.
Beginning with the beginning of our text. We are two days before the Passover. Two days before the celebration of God passing over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt and killing the first-born sons of all the Egyptians. Two days before retelling this story; two days before celebrating God sparing their life, the religious leaders are plotting to take a life. In John’s version of this story (and a version of this story appears in all four Gospels) the Sanhedrin, or Jewish leaders want Jesus dead, so that he doesn’t cause a disturbance and Rome doesn’t take their power away. The life and ministry of Jesus was a threat to their tenuous power and stability. And we know that when we get to the end of our text these leaders are one step closer to carrying out their plans.
In the Gospel of John’s version, Caiaphas, the high priest says that it is better that one man die than the whole nation. The end goal of maintaining political their power justifies the means of the death of one man. “Peace” by any means necessary. Martin Luther King Jr. said, however “Peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we arrive at that goal.” Peace by means of death is no peace.
But that scene now falls into the background and next we find Jesus in the house of a leper – violating all sorts of laws of cleanliness. Another example from Jesus’ life of moving from exclusion in towards inclusion. And it’s noteworthy that in the middle of a very stressful week, Jesus is visiting and dining with outcasts.
And as they sit there, a woman with an alabaster jar of “very costly ointment” shows up. A few weeks back we heard Rita’s wonderful reflection on this woman from the Luke text, but our Mark text has some significant differences. She anoints his head, and not his feet as in Luke, and in Luke nothing is mentioned of the value of the perfume in her bottle. But here in Mark we are told it is expensive perfume, and we soon hear more details of its value. And after this act of anointing, of devotion and deep love, some present at the meal are indignant and ask “Why was this oil wasted in this way?”
Why was this oil wasted this way? Through this act this woman demonstrates her deep devotion and extravagant love for this Jesus, and these people, and I think we can safely assume these people are men, look at this act of devotion and see nothing but waste. This act serves no useful purpose. The cost benefit ratio of this act is absolutely zero. Then they comment – “it could have sold for more than a year’s wages”. She was busy anointing Jesus in love and they were busy figuring out the market value of a jar of nard. Her worship was surely not as valuable as more than a year’s wages. And think of all the good and noble things they could have done with that money. (I have to think this expression of concern for the poor comes across as a little bit of convenient, self-righteous piety compared to this wasteful and thoughtless woman. I wonder if in their hearts they were thinking of other, less noble ways to spend that money.)
“And they rebuked her harshly.” They shamed her. Shaming this foolish woman who just wasn’t thinking logically. This woman was just squandering her resources. This is a ridiculous woman.
Now let’s stop this story for a bit. Place yourselves in the shoes of the disciples. How would you have felt seeing this extravagant and expensive act? Whether out loud or in your heart wouldn’t we be thinking about all the better and more just and useful ways we could spend that money? Isn’t this Less with More and not More With Less? Would we be thinking about all the poor you could feed? I’m guessing we would.
But Jesus rebukes the men just as he rebuked them when they attempted to keep the children from him. Jesus states “She has done a beautiful thing for me.” These guys saw poor economic decision making, and Jesus saw beauty. A beauty that had no price. Where Jesus saw love they saw economic value that could be turned into charity.
And I love Jesus simple statement “She did what she could.” You disciples are sitting in judgement and she is doing what she could. What she could do is worship and love Jesus and prepare Jesus for his death. And she did it in the most beautiful way. Like Jesus’ reply to Martha “There is need of only one true thing, and this unnamed woman has chosen the better part.”
This kind of anointing that Jesus received was typically reserved for the crowning of a king, and for preparing a body for burial. In this act the unnamed woman accomplished both purposes.
And where the men wanted to shame and dismiss her as being counter to the good work of Jesus, Jesus in turn praises her and say that the story of her and what she has done will be an essential part of hearing the good news for all the years to come. This act of reckless, wasteful love would be central to the proclamation of the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God is like expensive perfume running down your hair and face.
And after this scene where this woman comes into the house and comes toward Jesus, Judas in turn, leaves Jesus and leaves the house to bring us back to our opening scene of leaders plotting Jesus’ death. Judas goes to the chief priests and offers to betray Jesus. And here too, just like worship had a price, so to betrayal has a price – and betraying Jesus brings 30 pieces of silver. Wikipedia tells me that was about 4 months of pay. Far less than that bottle of perfume cost.
These scenes of assigning economic value to acts of worship and acts of betrayal portrays some of the violence of this text. In this text love, worship, beauty, betrayal, life all can be bought and sold for a price. And the market says that extravagant expressions of love and devotion just aren’t worth that much, beauty isn’t worth that much, life isn’t worth that much, but chief priest and scribes holding onto power is worth a whole an awful lot – at least to the chief priests and scribes.
--------
Sometimes I’m concerned about the language I hear about immigration in Canada. In conversations about immigration, I often feel like immigrants are seen as a commodity we need to keep the machines of Canadian capitalism running. We need bodies that can work in our factories to make more widgets, and then buy the widgets, and then pay our taxes, and increase profit margins. We need the economic values of immigrant labour to prop up our economy. This is a horribly misplaced value. It’s like looking at your young child and calculating how many hours of free labour you will be able to extract from her. Human life is not a commodity.
In this text moving toward Jesus is love, and moving away from Jesus is death. In this text we see the powerful plot death, while the powerless worship, love, and anoint a new king. In this text the violence of heartless, economic values finds its opposite in beauty and extravagant worship.
Jesus’ rebukes putting a price on love and beauty. The value of these things are far beyond any market capitalist price. Beauty and worship and life cannot be bought and sold. They are all gift.
Christ emptied himself and came among us to demonstrate to us of the immeasurable value of each person: the lepers, the unnamed women, and even the chief priests. How can we but join with this woman and worship such a Christ.
And so I guess I should return to our Peoria Mennonite Fellowship – they had received this expensive and extravagant offer of a pipe organ when their focus had been directed to serving their community. What do you suppose they did?
I have no idea, I made it all up. Personally, I hope they accepted and celebrated the pipe organ, and were deeply moved in worship by the beautiful sounds echoing and resonating throughout their new church building as they blessed the food for the homeless.